Letter: Private funding of the public sector

Earl Russell
Thursday 24 February 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: We need to hear more about Labour's ideas on private funding. We need to know how far it has identified and overcome the problems inherent in the private funding of public services.

There is nothing immoral about private funding as such: the funds are not polluted by their source. The key problems are those of profit and risk. Where there is no legitimate profit, there is no useful role for private funding. Where the state will not underwrite the risks, the required level of profit is correspondingly increased. When a public service is privately funded, it becomes necessary to include a profit margin, thereby increasing the cost of the service. Whether this disadvantage is outweighed by the access to additional investment is a question to be settled on a case-by-case basis.

If a profit margin can be found, it becomes necessary to consider whether those things which must be done to produce a profit are likely to conflict with the object of the service. Profit will, for example, normally conflict with the object of doing justice, while it may not conflict with the object of running a Ministry canteen.

If Labour has no workable solutions to these problems, Liberal Democrats may enjoy the pleasure of attacking Labour from the left.

Yours sincerely,

RUSSELL

House of Lords

London, SW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in