LETTER:Private finance and the NHS: profits before patients or value for money?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Professor Harry Keen
Sir: You are to be congratulated on drawing the attention of the public to the extension of the Private Finance Initiative (PFI), a major threatened inroad of privatisation into the NHS ("Private firms to run NHS hospitals", 23 March). As you point out, the NHS "reforms" have now covertly moved us to the point where private finance can tender not only for NHS hospital buildings and capital developments but also for NHS clinical services. Trusts are compelled to accept the lowest tender.
Private finance is not going into this for its health - or ours. Its interest is in return on investment, likely therefore to be in buildings and equipment that will maximise profit. It also now appears to mean that if a clinical service can be supplied at lower than going NHS rates, this too will supplant the present methods of NHS staffing. Cost-conscious trust executives will be tempted to turn out existing clinical teams in favour of a cheaper package, or at least to use this as a further lever to bend professional staff to their will. Investors will wish to reduce the risk to their investment by exercising real control over the operation of the NHS facility. No problems of accountability here; it will be direct to the shareholders.
Professor Chris Ham, director of the Health Services Management Centre at the University of Birmingham, drew the profession's attention to the implications of the PFI in the British Medical Journal of 18 February. He noted PFI "projects to build and run entire new hospitals as well as extensions to or developments of existing buildings" in Norwich, Edinburgh, Durham, Peterborough, Swindon, London, Coventry and Worcester. All of this points to massively increased commercialisation of health care, not independent, but eating right into the heart of the NHS.
Yours sincerely,
HARRY KEEN
President
NHS Support Federation
London, E1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments