Letter: Prisons are not the only alternative
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Why should the Home Office stop at just comparing the performance of individual prisons in terms of their effectiveness in the rehabilitation of offenders ('Clark considers plan for prison league tables', 27 March)?
Since the non-custodial penalties available to the courts operate at a fraction of the cost of imprisonment, any such league table should at least incorporate an analysis of the effectiveness of all these alternatives to prison.
With the Government seeking to achieve substantial savings in public expenditure, it would seem particularly appropriate for it to consider not just the rehabilitation rates of different prison regimes but rather the overall cost-effectiveness of the whole of the sentencing system.
Yours faithfully,
NIGEL WILKINS
London, SW7
29 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments