Letter: Prison system isn't working
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As your leading article (13 October) rightly states, the Home Secretary has been singularly silent about the rehabilitation of offenders. This is perhaps not unconnected with the fact that he has ignored the professional advice that 'Prison does not work'.
We should not be surprised that Michael Howard chooses to ignore all professional advice on criminal justice. The Government, has presided over an increase in recorded crimes from 2.3 million in 1979 to more than 5 million last year; in the same period, violent crimes increased from 95,000 to 190,000.
It is, of course, no coincidence that in the same period government policies led to record levels of unemployment; cut local authority funding, exacerbating inner urban deprivation; took benefits away from 16- and 17-year-olds; and reduced income support for 18- to 24-year-olds by 25 per cent.
Far from recognising the direct link between these policies and the increase in crimes, and far from recognising professional advice on how to tackle crime, Mr Howard has decided that 'prison works'.
As Lord Woolf recognises, the probation service is best equipped to supervise the widest possible range of offenders in the community. Locking more people away, including 12- to 15-year-olds, may be a cheap way to buy votes, but, as Lord Woolf said, it is also 'short- sighted and irresponsible'.
Yours sincerely,
JUDY McKNIGHT
General Secretary
National Association of
Probation Officers
London, SW11
13 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments