Letter: Principled objections to identity cards
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I regret that you are no friend to individual self-determination ('A question of identification', 13 August). There are, in fact, two principled objections to any form of identity card.
First, I can object 'in principle' to having myself openly catalogued by the state simply for existing. Second, I can object 'in principle' to anything that makes it easier for the state and its agencies to manage me for its benefit rather than mine.
You may object in turn that all you have done is support a voluntary scheme to enable the free movement of peoples within Europe; that what we are considering is a card to enable a limited benefit - cross-border travel without hindrance. But surely our current passport is sufficient for that. What starts as a voluntary scheme for one purpose may soon become de facto compulsory for many others when different agencies use a 'voluntary' ID as a convenient (for them) entry ticket to other benefits - including private sector benefits such as credit.
This creeping and creepy ordering of the citizenry to ensure a common European home may be a price we are not all willing to pay. But then the failure to ask the people's opinion on Maastricht is about to break the bond of legitimacy between our Government and its subjects in any case.
Yours sincerely,
TIM PENDRY
London, N5
14 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments