Letter: Pride in Jewish triumph over terror
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: When I hosted your correspondent Sarah Helm over a cup of coffee at my home in Beit Hadassah, in the heart of Hebron, I assumed that the origin of the building's name was clear. It is not 'an elegant Arabesque villa' that we 'call Beit Hadassah'. That is its original name, and has been since its dedication as a small local hospital run by the Hadassah organisation at the turn of the century. The building was erected by the Jewish community of Hebron in 1893, and we are celebrating its centenary this year.
The slaughter of the Jews of Hebron by their Arab neighbours, in the riots of 1929, called a temporary halt to local Jewish life. Today, by returning and living at the site, we are proud to be part of a historical process signifying the triumph of justice over terror. Would it be too much to expect seekers of justice to understand, justify and even encourage the return of the Jews to the city of their patriarchs?
Ms Helm's claim that the violence of the Arabs and Jews towards one another in Hebron is 'cyclical' is wrong. In 1929, the Jews of Hebron constituted a small and modest community of scholars and rabbis. They were not 'settlers', but the descendants of the original residents of the city since the days of the patriarchs. At that time, no one ever dreamt of a Jewish state, not even within the 1948 borders. The Arabs who perpetrated the slaughter did so for no particular reason other than a lust for Jewish blood. Unfortunately, nothing has changed since then.
In 1929, the Jews of Hebron were totally vulnerable, lacking weapons and other means of self-defence. The British constabulary assigned to protect them stood by and observed the slaughter without reacting. Can Ms Helm justify the behaviour of those constables? Does anyone seriously believe that the Jews will again play the role of victim?
It is best for all to know that the situation has changed: the Children of Israel have returned to their rightful borders, which include Hebron, the City of the Patriarchs.
Sincerely,
NOAM ARNON
Beit Hadassah
Hebron
(Graphic omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments