Letter: Price of Green Belt

Kenneth Wilson
Friday 23 January 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: A Green Belt tax would not, as you report ("Prescott proposes Green Belt tax", 20 January), make houses built on the Green Belt more expensive.

The price of a house is determined by what someone will pay for it. Many of the costs in its production, such as bricks and wages, are relatively fixed. What the land is worth depends on the price the finished house will fetch, not the other way around.

A Green Belt tax is a windfall tax. Windfall profits accrue to those who sell land for development, the value of which is created by largely external factors. Many governments since the First World War have attempted to tax these windfall profits, but only very small sums have ever been collected. Landowners are often in a position to take a long-term view, and most simply wait for a government of a different hue to remove the tax. The only result is bottlenecks in the supply of development land, further aggravating the problems of the housing market.

This government has shown some determination over windfall taxes, so perhaps they will be able to devise a solution.

KENNETH WILSON

Wolverhampton

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in