Letter: Pressure of tourism on mountaineering

Lord Hunt
Friday 17 May 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Pressure of tourism on mountaineering

Sir: I share the concern of many mountaineers about the recent tragedy involving a commercially organised expedition on Everest (Stephen Goodwin; "Freedom to risk your life", 14 May). There may well be a case for reviewing the exploitation of the world's highest mountain, as an extension of tourism.

Anyone who has experienced a storm at - or above the South Col (8,000 metres) will be aware that natural forces of wind and weather can be more powerful than the technical skills of even the best qualified climbers.

Despite this, the incentive to succeed, to provide value for the large sums of money which commercial clients are willing to pay, may have an adverse effect on sound mountaineering judgement.

Unlike the other recent tragedies on K2, the second highest mountain, where climbers have accepted similar risks with a full awareness of the dangers of storm conditions at high altitude, clients of high mountain tourism may have neither the knowledge nor the competence to cope in bad weather.

There is no easy solution to this problem. But while agreeing that there must be, to quote Mr Goodwin, "freedom to risk your life", I suggest that the "host" country - in this case, Nepal - should be more stringent in the matter of requiring evidence of individual competence before issuing expedition permits to commercial expeditions to climb on Everest, rather than relying solely on a policy of restricting the numbers of climbers on the mountain, by exacting astronomically high fees.

John Hunt

Lord Hunt of

Llandfairwaterdine

Aston, Oxfordshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in