Letter: Press regulation: a Bill killed, tragic revelations, the global village, sellers of sleaze
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your article 'A rude, sometimes nasty, but essential watchdog' (12 January) makes a noble defence of the press as a purveyor of important news and serious political criticism. This may well be true of certain sections of the press, including your newspaper, but there is another section which contains no important news or serious political criticism, and which one of its proprietors once described as a branch of the entertainment industry.
Freedom of the press is one thing, freedom of the entertainment industry is another, particularly when the entertainment provided is mostly sleaze, soft porn or invasions of privacy. I know of no sacred principle which justifies total liberty for that kind of thing.
Yours faithfully,
WILLIAM HAYTER
Stanton St John, Oxfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments