Letter: Poplar planning
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE picture painted by Chris Blackhurst's article about the housing development at Kingston (25 March) is of an idyllic row of poplars in the middle of a local park. In fact, the poplars were planted to conceal the large and unsightly power station from the town and park.
The developer, with the agreement of the local council, has agreed to replant trees elsewhere in the scheme and the trees, by the council's admission, only had a lifespan of another 20 years. These actions were agreed by the local authority as part of the planning process. The local public had every opportunity to raise objections at the time when planning permission was being sought.
If we are not to build on the greenbelt in the future, then the development of brownfield sites such as these will need the co-operation of the local community.
JAMES PELLATT
London N2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments