Letter: Poor people are not abusing the legal aid system
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Paul Vallely ("Natural born litigants", 2 July) should consider the plight of many poor people in this country who do not have access to justice.
There are hundreds if not thousands of potential litigants who are truly deserving of their legal remedy who are unable to pursue their meritorious cases because of the absence of funding. Furthermore, those plaintiffs who do qualify for legal aid have been paying very significant contributions to their legal aid for many years despite the inaccuracies in the media to the contrary.
One of my clients who sustained life threatening injuries as a result of a simple fall, is in receipt of family credit and she pays in excess of pounds 60 per month for the duration of the case. Seemingly it would be popular if more poor people paid even more. Other deserving clients who have had their lives ruined in appalling medical negligence cases cannot proceed because, despite their meagre incomes, they are outside eligibility levels and are unable to fund the expensive investigations.
It is very difficult in those circumstances to offer Lord Mackay's words of encouragement that people should "take a robust approach to life and accept that not every knock requires a legal response". Balancing civil liberties, public interest and policy objectives is never easy but the recent attack by the Lord Chancellor's junior minister upon Cyril Smith, who wishes to pursue a medical negligence action, is totally disgraceful. Should we not demand or expect standards of reasonable competence from our professionals?
I applaud government efforts to prevent abuses by rich people utilising funds that were intended for the poor, but the current hysterical campaign that poor people en masse are abusing the legal aid system by pursuing trivial cases, is appalling. It is not true. The legal aid system is vigorous in ensuring that only meritorious cases proceed.
ANDREW MCDONALD
Legal Aid Solicitor
Redcar,
Cleveland
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments