Letter: Pollution and the diesel debate
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Shauna Massey's article 'The jury on diesel is not yet closed' (18 October) came to the right conclusion - that the environmental debate between diesel and petrol is too close to call, and that poor maintenance contributes the majority of pollution. But in doing so she seems to have made two quite serious mistakes.
The first is where she says that lead was replaced by benzene when unleaded petrol was introduced. The lead in petrol is there to increase its octane.
But unleaded premium petrol has a lower octane number than leaded 4-star, so there was no need to replace it with benzene or anything else.
In fact, unleaded petrol now contains less benzene than leaded petrol did in 1986, the year when unleaded petrol was first introduced into the UK.
Incidentally benzene is produced in the refining process, it is not added as an optional extra to petrol.
Second, although diesel engines do give off less carbon dioxide, not even their most enthusiastic supporter would claim this is only a third of what the equivalent petrol engine emits. It is generally accepted that a diesel's carbon dioxide performance is 10-30 per cent better than a petrol engine.
Sincerely, DAVID PARKER Director General Petroleum Industry Association London, WC2 18 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments