Letter: Politics without George Walden
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I find it sad that someone who is as clever as George Walden MP believes he is should have such a patchy understanding of the nature of the political process by which, over time, yesterday's bold ideas become tomorrow's accepted policies.
He admits to Donald Macintyre ("Out of the house of illusions", 25 July) a "relative lack of practical political skill". To be an effective politician, to stick by your case, to tell the truth as you see it, in season and out, to persuade others of it, to move it forward step by step, as opportunity allows, does indeed require skill. But it also requires other qualities as well, such as courage and persistence.
In the 12 years or so that he has been in the House of Commons, Mr Walden has floated a number of interesting ideas, mostly very perceptive, many relevant to our national condition and some quite uncomfortable, but all the better, it seems to me, for this last characteristic. What he has failed to do is to get stuck in, to persist.
His decision now to fold his tent and walk away at precisely the moment when opinion is moving towards him should not be seen as a valid verdict on our democratic system by a disillusioned participant, but rather as a measure of his own failure fully to engage himself in it, and of his capacity for melancholy, pessimism and misjudgement.
Yours sincerely,
Humphry Crum Ewing
Reading
25 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments