Letter: Political realities of peace-keeping
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: James Roberts's stimulating article ('A way out of the apocalypse', 8 September) suggesting that the UN should continue to work through clan elders in the absence of government has a romantic ring, but also a serious application which goes much wider than Somalia. Aid agencies have for years worked with traditional chiefs and valued the relationship, because their authority at village level has generally not been undermined by the nation state. It is not just essential that they be involved: they already are.
The problem arises at the intermediate, regional level where the clan has achieved a political and military strength out of proportion to size and territory - often through colonial bias. Pretoria still provides the most flagrant example. But this is not just occurring in Africa. Kashmir, Cambodia and Northern Ireland show how hard it is to go back to an original expression of clan.
While devolution is a fairly safe guiding principle, democracy is often either wishful thinking or a sham (look at lusophone and francophone Africa). Isn't it time we dropped it? The political reality now requires that negotiations have to go on at several levels of representation. While majorities obviously have to be pacified, minorities as well as traditional forms of government should be given a higher status wherever possible in peace-keeping arrangements.
This in turn means that nations, while avoiding too much paperwork, must give far more support to the UN and the many voluntary agencies who are doing their dirty work for them.
Yours sincerely,
JOHN MONTAGU
London, SW11
9 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments