Letter: Political Adverts
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Sir: John Rentoul ("Now for a short break from free speech", 15 December) criticises the Independent Television Commission for banning the Christian Aid advertisement advocating the cancellation of Third World debt.
He goes on to say that "clearly" it would be wrong for the Trades Union Congress to be allowed to produce an advertisement supporting, say, the Liberal Party. Why is this so clearly wrong? We are all familiar with the excesses of political advertising in the US, but this stems from the strength of freedom of speech enjoyed by Americans, the same freedom (lauded in John Rentoul's article) which makes it possible for concerned people of all kinds to pay collectively for a TV advertisement stating their case.
True freedom of speech is only possible when granted to all - rich people, poor people, politicians and soap makers. If the TUC can place political advertising on TV, I will rejoice to see true freedom of speech in this surprisingly repressive country.
Justin Keery
London WC2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments