Letter: Police protection
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I was appalled to read of Kenneth Clarke's proposals for reviewing discipline procedures within the police service (31 March), as there is the possibility of having a system of double standards. It is a fundamental principle of English law that a person is innocent until proven guilty and that guilt must be proved 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
The same rule applies whether it is a minor or serious offence. Why then, should a police officer, when confronted with an allegation, have to accept a lower standard of proof? Why should he be treated any differently by the law he upholds, enforces and serves? In addition, why shouldn't a police officer be afforded the same right of silence as any other citizen?
I am all in favour of the discipline system being 'speeded up', as protracted inquiries cause undue stress for everyone involved. Chief constables already have unlimited powers when disciplining officers and have long accepted evidence that is of a much lower standard than would be accepted in a court of law. Can you imagine Mr Clarke QC, when he was practising counsel, accepting for his client what he is proposing for the police? I think not.
Yours faithfully,
G. S. COOPER
Doncaster
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments