Letter: Police complaints acted on promptly

Sir Leonard Peach
Friday 11 September 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Simon Garfield ('Kenneth and Audrey's ordeal', 5 September) alleges that the Police Complaints Authority acted 'with bureaucratic languor and after many months denied any malpractice' in the case of Kenneth and Audrey Higginson.

Since, under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, the investigation of Mr and Mrs Higginson's complaint did not have to be supervised by this authority, the investigation was carried out by Derbyshire Constabulary. Their report was sent to this authority on 10 January 1992. We gave careful consideration to the evidence arising from the investigation and wrote to Mr and Mrs Higginson on 7 February. We are committed, as far as it is possible, to completing files within 28 days of receipt, which we achieved.

Our remit is to investigate and review complaints against police in the context of the police discipline code. While we will bring any evidence suggesting there may have been a wrongful conviction uncovered by an investigation to the appropriate department, it is not our role to determine the innocence or guilt of a complainant. The authority's role extends only to allegations of misbehaviour against police officers. In order to prove such allegations, the evidence must prove the disciplinary charge to the higest standard, that is 'beyond reasonable doubt'.

Yours faithfully,

LEONARD PEACH

Chairman

Police Complaints Authority

London, SW1

8 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in