Letter: Poisonous propaganda against refugees

Dr M. Louise Pirouet
Thursday 23 July 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Stephen Palffy's letter (22 July), suggesting the British Government should match Hungary's level of assistance to those fleeing the war in the former Yugoslavia, and other similar calls in the past few days, demonstrate people's generosity towards refugees when their plight is properly understood.

Unfortunately, the debate about refugees has been poisoned by propaganda suggesting that the majority of them are 'bogus' or economic migrants, no matter that most come from countries where there is severe repression or armed conflict.

Indeed, if they flee from countries where there is civil war, it is often claimed by the Home Office that they do not qualify for refugee status under the UN Convention relating to the status of refugees, though they may be given exceptional leave to remain on humanitarian grounds. But without full refugee status they will be refused for years on end the right to bring their wives and children to join them.

In the last few years some of those fleeing civil war and persecution in Sri Lanka have been forcibly returned by the Home Office. Some Kurds, after being repeatedly beaten up and detained in squalid conditions in Iraq and Turkey, have been refused full refugee status on the grounds that they have not been personally singled out for persecution: they suffer only the same measure of danger as every other Kurd.

Many so-called 'bogus' refugees have just not suffered quite sufficiently, in the view of the Home Office, to be allowed to find sanctuary. The more sophisticated forms of torture, for instance, do not leave scars.

The numbers seeking asylum in Britain have declined dramatically since they peaked last year. Only some 30 to 40 a week are applying at ports of entry. The number already legally in the country and applying for asylum has more than halved since last year.

Nevertheless, the Government is spearheading moves to crack down on asylum-seeking throughout the European Community, and to introduce harsh legislation here. If people knew the truth of the situation, they would not support this legislation as it stands.

Yours faithfully,

M. LOUISE PIROUET

Co-ordinator

Charter '87 for Refugees

Cambridge

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in