Letter: Pointed observation on Christmas trees

Dr Julian Evans
Thursday 23 December 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Over coffee at the Forestry Commission's Alice Holt Research Station, we discussed your correspondent's observation (letter, 22 December) about those who draw Christmas trees. None of the three main types - Norway spruce, Scots pine or the splendid Noble fir - usually exhibit downward-pointing branches.

We offer four explanations for this piece of artistic licence:

1. The artist may think of trees weighed down by snow or even heavy baubles.

2. Some particularly impressive conifers, especially those found in northern latitudes or at high altitude where heavy snowfall is common, do display a pendulous habit.

3. The symmetry is more pleasing.

4. Tradition - perhaps arising from the Germanic origins of our Christmas trees in Victorian times (ie, acquired from a country where snow is more common and alpine habit more familiar).

The Forestry Commission does not have a tree-breeding programme to produce the idealised tree of artists, but we would encourage continued use of the real thing, rather than plastic substitutes, as far more environment friendly.

Yours faithfully,

JULIAN EVANS

Chief Research Officer

The Forestry Authority

Research Division

Farnham, Surrey

22 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in