Letter: Poet's defence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr David Burnett
Sir: The Poetry Society is reported in today's issue (16 February) to be concerned with what it describes as "vanity" publishing. How can it possibly know and assert that this is the sole or, at least, the predominant motive of authors who publish work at their own expense? Is it not more likely, as well as more charitable, to suppose that such authors are moved by a strong conviction of the worth of their work?
Further, how is it possible today to be certain that such a conviction is misplaced and that such work is nugatory and should therefore be discouraged? In fact, many fine writers such as Proust had to publish work at their own expense, while others such as Blake did so throughout their lives. This does not reflect upon their worth - let alone their vanity - but upon the deficiencies of contemporary critical opinion.
Yours faithfully,
David Burnett
Durham
16 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments