Letter: Plutonium for sale
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: We told you so. Profoundly irritating, but true. The world simply cannot go on and on manufacturing nuclear explosives and not expect some of it to end up in the wrong hands. (What, indeed, are the right hands?)
Britain accepts a 2 to 3 per cent margin of error in its fissile material stock accountancy and claims that the discrepancy between actual and book figures has no physical reality. Maybe. Maybe not. Two per cent of Britain's fissile material stockpile (generally accepted as 10 tonnes of highly enriched uranium and three of plutonium) adds up to an awful lot of unaccounted-for nuclear explosive. And of course our accountants are wonderful. What about not only the Russian stocks but those of the US, France, China . . . ? What of Japan, Germany, India and all the other countries with civil stocks?
We can face the problem by throwing up our hands in horrified surrender or we can try, even at this late hour, to halt and then to reverse this remorseless build- up. Step one must be to stop all fissile material production, whether described as for military or civil purposes. In Britain, that means closing down the Thorp plutonium production plant.
Next, all existing stocks must be placed under international inspection and control. That includes ours. We cannot expect Russia or any other country to accept a regime that we refuse to join.
These measures would stabilise the situation and begin the building of an atmosphere of trust, rather than panic. Then, maybe, we could move on to actually getting rid of the stuff.
Yours sincerely,
DAVE DURHAM
Vice-Chair
CND
London, N7
18 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments