Letter: Plight of Whitehall exposed

Barry Reamsbottom
Thursday 28 March 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Like a thief in the night who suddenly has the lights turned on him, ministers and their policies have been devastatingly exposed ("Ombudsman flays Whitehall over staff cuts", 21 March).

William Reid's report linking the dramatic rise in the number of cases of maladministration by departments and agencies to staff cuts across the Civil Service is highly significant. The annual report by the ombudsman acts as a barometer on the state and health of the Civil Service and I cannot remember any previous report being so critical and outspoken as this one.

Ministers, who for the past five years have paid mere lip service to the idea of better public services, have now been found out. For the first time it is not just the trade unions and the opposition parties who are saying that the Civil Service is in a state of crisis: even the independent parliamentary ombudsman is bitterly complaining that you cannot expect service standards to be maintained or improved if you cut staffing levels year after year.

The fact that the day after William Reid's report was published, the Department of Social Security announced that further budget reductions would be likely to result in an additional 21,000 staff being cut, sends the clearest of signals. Clearly, the need, at any cost, for this unpopular government to finance a treasure chest for a big pre-election tax cut, is a greater priority than decent public services.

Barry Reamsbottom

General Secretary

The Civil and Public Services

Association

London SW11

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in