Letter: Philosophical ethics
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Ray Monk, in his review of Michael Dummett's new book Origins of Analytical Philosophy (7 August), returns to a favourite theme of his, the need for a rapprochement between Anglo-Saxon philosophy and continental thought. But what makes the gap unbridgeable between many continental philosophers, their acolytes and analytic philosophy, has nothing to do with agreement or difference over basic philosophical issues or over the legacy of Frege and Husserl. It is a matter of intellectual ethics.
In English-speaking philosophy it is still considered, thankfully, de rigueur to state your theses and back them up by argument in such a way that your peers can show you where you are wrong. To use mystification either as a defensive weapon or
as a cheap way of appearing 'deep' is still bad form. For all the in-
sights of Heidegger and Adorno and the intellectual brilliance of Derrida and Lacan, their intellectual style corrupts and evidence of its cor-
ruption is to be seen in those
areas of Anglo-Saxon academic life where post-structuralism and post- modernism has taken root.
Yours faithfully,
R. A. SHARPE
Department of Philosophy
University of Wales
Lampeter, Dyfed
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments