Letter: Philistine reactions to our city trees
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The new policy of some councils and developers (Section II; 'No place for a tree', 12 November) of removing the old large trees from our cities' pavements is outrageous. The large chestnut, elm and plane trees are a cultural institution in many large towns, and in London are as much part of the city as the Underground or the red buses.
The excuses made by these council officials for getting rid of the trees are lamentable. Reasons vary from the 'excessive attention a tree needs' to 'management difficulties'. However, if these philistines win we may have cities full of cherry trees.
Plane, elm, ash and chestnut have been part of city life throughout Europe over the past 200 years. We must act now to protect them, for some councils have already started removing the grand old trees.
Yours sincerely,
BRIAN STEWART
Hastings,
Sussex
12 November
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments