Letter: Perils of predicting the national wealth

John Muellbauer
Saturday 03 October 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BRIAN CATHCART ('Economists? Who needs 'em?', 27 September) tars the entire profession with the same brush. I tried to persuade policy-makers from autumn 1986 onwards of the consequences for inflation and the balance of payments of the credit and house-price boom then beginning, and warned of the dangers in relying entirely on high interest rates to crush it. Moreover, I warned of the need for a sterling devaluation not just two weeks ago, but last autumn.

Forecasting is inherently difficult. First the structure of the economy changes: think of UK financial liberalisation in the 1980s or of the current German attempt to integrate the decrepit economy of East Germany. Second, the behaviour of politicians has to be forecast: how will the ongoing battle between Chancellor Kohl and the Bundesbank end? Repair of the central faultline in the ERM could occur in weeks, months or years. My bet is on it taking weeks but I could well be wrong.

Third, the data with which economists work are often poor. One of the unforgiveable blunders of Thatcherism was to slash the statistical monitoring of the economy just as some of the biggest policy experiments in history were being performed on it.

John Muellbauer

Nuffield College

Oxford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in