Letter: Pension rights and wrongs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Polly Toynbee suggests ("Why I should give back my widow's pension", 4 December) that there is no need for the well-off to draw universal benefits - sickness, unemployment, child benefit or pensions.
That means that those benefits would all have to be means-tested. Who would welcome that? When there is such a large disparity between the incomes of the rich and the poor, a better way of giving the Government more money would be to tax the rich more, by making income tax more steeply graduated, as it was years ago. In addition, inheritance tax should be graduated, as capital transfer tax used to be.
I am not suggesting that we should go back to the particular rates of tax in force when the Conservatives came to power in 1979. To aim at a half-way position might be better.
JOHN WYMER
Bridport, Dorset
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments