Letter: Peace of a sort in the Middle East
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is sad that so clever a man as Conor Cruise O'Brien ('Arafat is not the bringer of peace', 8 July) should become, when he writes about Palestine, not merely a Zionist publicist - which we have come to expect - but a propagandist for Likud, Israel's aggressively expansionist and largely racist right-wing party.
Dr O'Brien complains that Arafat cannot give Israel peace in exchange for her gift of territory. He would have been more honest had he said that Arafat cannot give Israel peace because Israel has not given him territory.
The reason why the peace process is unpopular with many Palestinians is that the Oslo and Cairo agreements denote, in the words of the Israeli, Meron Benvenisti, an 'absolute Israeli victory' and an 'abject Palestinian defeat'. Israel remains in control, and all her illegal settlements, for which she has stolen Palestinian land, remain in place. In other words, what are on offer are Palestinian bantustans.
Nevertheless, Yitzhak Rabin and the Israeli Labour government are, to the fury of Likud, trying to make a peace of a sort. The alternative after all, which Dr O'Brien carefully omits to mention, is a continuation of Israel's brutal and rapacious occupation: torture, the use of live ammunition on unarmed children (hundreds of whom have been killed or wounded), mass imprisonment, collective punishments, more and more illegal settlements, apartheid, settler violence and a wrecked economy. All that is fine in the eyes of Likud and, evidently, O'Brien.
Conor Cruise ''O'Zion', it has been said, 'specialises in exonerating the overdog (but) is no slouch at blaming the underdog'. That is certainly true of him over the Israelis and the Palestinians.
Let us hope that in future he confines his overdog views on Palestine to the US lecture circuit, where they will be welcomed by deluded American matrons, and spares your better-informed readers here his Likudist propaganda masquerading as serious analysis.
Yours faithfully,
IAN GILMOUR
House of Lords
London, SW1
10 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments