Letter: Patent law moving in on human genes

Ken Campbell
Thursday 05 June 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I note with interest your report on the patent granted to Biocyte relating to the use of umbilical cord stem cells in therapy. This is an area in which the Leukaemia Research Fund is supporting a major research programme at the University of Bristol.

Although the patent in question relates to use of umbilical cord stem cells the umbilical cord is not the only source of stem cells. The essence of bone marrow transplantation is the presence within the marrow of stem cells capable of producing all types of blood cells. New techniques also permit the harvesting of these vital stem cells from circulating blood. The significance of using umbilical cord stem cells is the feasibility of establishing banks of frozen cord blood stem cells. The Leukaemia Research Fund in partnership with the National Blood Authority have recently been awarded a grant by the National Lottery to establish a cord blood bank in Bristol. This will form a part of a national network of banks. There is a further probable benefit in that stem cells from a newborn infant (which are immunologically naive) may not require such exact matching with the recipient as those from an adult donor.

It would be unfortunate if commercial considerations were to block the potential benefits of these new therapeutic options. The Leukaemia Research Fund, along with other interested parties, hopes for a vigorous public debate.

KEN CAMPBELL

Information Officer

Leukaemia Research Fund

London WC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in