Letter: Party donations mean political distortions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Tim Jackson ('Take the money - and confess', 22 June) asserts that it is understandable that foreign governments and companies should wish to influence British government policy by donating money to British political parties. It is indeed understandable, but it should not be allowed. Indeed, the whole issue of financing political parties should be re-examined, with the aim of reducing the importance of money in the political process.
Perhaps the best route would be to ban all political donations, with parties being financed by the state in proportion to their electoral support. (In voting for a party an elector would therefore be voting his share of state financing to that party).
We are rightly proud to live in a democracy. But democracy means 'rule of the people', not 'rule of money'. Politicians should listen to their electors and employers, the British people, and consider their best interests only. Fat cheques being slipped under political parties' back doors serve only to distort the decision-making process, shifting power away from the electorate and towards anyone, British or foreign, who has money to burn (be it their own or other people's, ie shareholders and trade unionists).
Ours is not a healthy democracy. Not only are the wishes of the majority of the electorate routinely ignored at general elections, thanks to our outmoded electoral system, but it is now becoming increasingly clear that the real power in this country rests with the few, and not with the many. The time for radical institutional reform has never been riper.
Yours faithfully,
PAUL GORDON
London, W2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments