LETTER:Overcoming wig and pen ideology
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Austin Mitchell, MP
Sir: If the legal profession and its friends in Parliament succeed in delaying Lord Mackay's proposals (Section Two; "After divorce, another fight", 7 February), to be fully revealed in a White Paper around Easter, then it will fall to Labour to extract from the proposals their radical intentions and incorporate these into the general reform of legal services that is now essential.
Frustrating the Lord Chancellor's intentions has become the profession's most practised expertise. On rights of audience, on fees, on divorce, he has been confronted with a bizarre coalition of die-hards and reactionaries.
The way to break their log-jam is for the public to understand that legal services can be provided more efficiently than the legal profession will admit. Rights could be more generally enforced if resources were used more wisely. Public defenders and law centres working within the community would be far more efficient than legal aid channelled through high-street offices, which have to cover profits as well as staff costs. If properly done, the transition would allow a greater use of information technology than the wig and pen ideology of the legal professions can contemplate.
Yours sincerely,
Austin Mitchell
MP for Great Grimsby (Lab)
House of Commons
London, SW1
The writer is chair of the Campaign for a National Legal Service.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments