Letter: Our links to the long chain of genetic evolution

Professor Malcolm Potts
Thursday 13 January 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The Archbishop of York's discussion of 'Where should babies come from?' (11 January) is welcome. To Christians, having 'a dead foetus as a genetic mother' is offensive, as life is seen as a series of discontinuous lives. Some commentators have called the process 'yucky', but as a biologist such a possibility reminds me how my brief life is one link in 2 billion years of genetic evolution based on slowly changing messages coded in a potentially immortal DNA.

Our diploid (full complement of chromosomes) body sets aside the haploid (half complement of chromosomes essential to sexual reproduction) early in foetal life. That is why an aborted foetus has the potential to provide more eggs for IVF than an adult woman. A child born as the result of fertilising an egg from a foetus has reduced the haploid link in the chain of life from what may be several tens of years to two or three months.

I agree with Dr Habgood that, when discussing IVF, 'the long- term implications for a proper evaluation of our own humanity are profound'; but I do not find the use of eggs from an aborted foetus changes the moral equation concerning this particular technology: indeed, the idea reminds me of the phase of biological life that connects us with all other living creatures on our tiny planet.

Yours sincerely,

MALCOLM POTTS

London, W8

12 January

The writer holds the Bixby chair in Family Planning and Population at the University of California, Berkeley.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in