Letter : Orthodox view of an art `priest'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr David Sylvester
Sir: In his review of the De Kooning show at the Tate Gallery, Andrew Graham-Dixon casts me in the role of "Pope" in a "canonisation" of that artist ("In search of the edible woman", 21 February). But De Kooning was canonised before Mr Graham-Dixon was born and the officiating clergy were men of the calibre of Meyer Schapiro and Harold Rosenberg, by comparison with whom I am a parish priest in a remote village.
It is ludicrous that Mr Graham-Dixon should bother to take issue with my view of De Kooning's worth as if it were a highly personal view rather than one that is perfectly orthodox and commonplace among those, especially painters, who know about modern art. As a critic, Mr Graham-Dixon copes well enough with the work of his countrymen but at the sight of anything American seems increasingly prone to panic.
Yours etc,
DAVID SYLVESTER
London, W11
22 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments