Letter: Origins of the Mulberry harbours' codename
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The suggestion in your article 'Mulberry harbours impressive, but doubts over their value' (3 June) that the codename 'Mulberry' was selected at random is probably incorrect.
The Admiralty has long had strong connections with Bath, and after the Bath blitz in 1942 the Department of the Civil-Engineer- in-Chief was relocated to Kingswood School, where the harbours were largely designed. His personal office overlooked the school mulberry tree, which still survives, although it now has to be propped up.
The school has two large drawings, together with a framed dedication, from the Admiralty - one a working document on which the progress of production was recorded, the other a unique cartoon with features illustrated according to their codenames.
Yours sincerely,
ROGER STRAKER
President-Designate
The Kingswood Association
Hove, East Sussex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments