Letter: Opt-out requirement for organ transplants
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I note in your report on the Review of Medical Research by the Advisory Council on Science and Technology ('Organ 'opt-out scheme needed' ', 3 February) that Dr Peter Doyle is quoted as saying that 'not one kidney transplant in 1990 was done from a person carrying a donor card'.
This statement has no basis in fact and helps to continue the misconception that donor cards are of no value in the provision of organs from cadaveric kidney donors. During 1990, 1991 and 1992 in the Oxford region, 38, 43 and 46 per cent respectively of donors of solid organs were carrying a donor card. In all such instances this made the approach and discussion of organ donation with the relatives a relatively straightforward affair for all concerned.
Whether an opt-out system is required or not is another argument, and I personally am not persuaded that this is the way to go, but I do wish to correct the misconception that the donor card system is of no value. Not only do an increasing number of donors carry a card but the cards also serve an extremely valuable purpose in stimulating discussion of the subject among the public.
Yours sincerely,
PETER J. MORRIS
Nuffield Department of Surgery
University of Oxford
5 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments