Letter: Oncomouse: power of a patent, Christian perspective, the 'green rat'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Dr Adrian Brasnett (Letters, 20 January) takes a peculiar moral stand if he feels that, as a European patent attorney, he can isolate his role from the whole process of patenting and using (and abusing) the 'Oncomouse'.
We are at the frontiers of genetic engineering. An Oncomouse is a genetically modified organism, or GMO, 'patented' to enable testing on animals to be taken a stage further. Not content with subjecting thousands of animals to horrific experiments and tests, we are 'designing' new creatures.
I urge the government to investigate human tissue culture and the newly invented 'green rat' - a computerised device for testing toxic substances. Surely the only true model for man is man, not animals, and surely it is not beyond the ingenuity of the human brain to devise suitable computer models for those practices that would otherwise cause us pain - a choice not open to animals employed in experimentation.
We now know that of the seven million chemicals we have devised, 80,000 are toxic and having widespread effects injurious to mankind and the environment.
The great moral question facing all of us is: 'Because we can do a thing, should we?' The Royal Commission on the Environment has just reported on the hazards of toxic substances. It should now consider genetic engineering and the Oncomouse, before it is too late and patents are established more for commercial interests than our greater good. This is tinkering with nature in a most frightening way.
Yours faithfully,
D. A. HOLT
Brandsby
North Yorkshire
21 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments