Letter:Office blocks mar Newcastle splendour
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms Joyce Quin Sir: Peter Dormer's interesting and perceptive article on Newcastle (1 February) is nevertheless somewhat inaccurate as far as the builder Richard Grainger is concerned. Grainger's 19th-century development did not involve large-scale demolition of existing properties - much of it was built on green land and gardens in the area adjacent to the Lort Burn, which was itself filled in and culverted over to allow Grey Street to be built.
Of course, the strategy of finding new uses for the elegant listed buildings of the city is welcome. In my view, however, Newcastle's attractiveness as a regional capital would be greatly enhanced by the demolition of the uglier 1960s/70s office blocks, some of which unhappily are sited amidst the classical splendour which Peter Dormer is so rightly keen to see preserved for the future.
Yours faithfully, Joyce Quin MP for Gateshead East (Lab)
House of Commons London, SW1
1 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments