Letter: Of frogs and heroines

Ms Elizabeth Adams
Saturday 22 January 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Emma Bagnall ('Dear Dorothea Brooke', 20 January) misses the point about Dorothea - and about George Eliot, too.

Dorothea Brooke may have been described as 'the greatest heroine in Victorian literature', but I think that would have made her creator laugh. George Eliot didn't believe in heroes and heroines, she believed in people, with their mixture of good and bad, consistencies and contradictions. Dorothea is confused; she may be on the brink of being a feminist, but she is also saddled with her milieu and cannot conceive of doing good works in ways beyond those that immediately present themselves. In other words, her idealism is not matched by her courage or imagination.

George Eliot may have lived outside 'respectable' society, but she kissed a few frogs before deciding to live with George Lewes. Who knows? She may, had they asked her, have married one of those frogs and lived to question the value of what she had done - just like Dorothea.

I am surprised that you recommend Dorothea to adjust her decollete, because 'using sex got Scarlett O'Hara where she wanted to be'. Does acting in this way make women post-feminists? If so, we have not changed since Rosamund Vincy]

Yours sincerely,

ELIZABETH ADAMS

London, N22

20 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in