Letter: OECD on jobs: adaptability, not flexibility, is the key
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Vincent Cable ('Wrong readings of the Chapter', 7 June) sees only higher costs as a result of the Social Chapter, with detrimental consequences for jobs. But this is a very static view of the impact of measures that aim to give workers more rights and security.
First, evidence cited by the OECD suggests long-term relationships are crucial to future productivity growth. Legislation that pushes firms and workers towards working together and feeling commitment to each other is therefore likely to produce dynamic gains over the medium term.
Second, while we can all agree that flexibility will be a key to competitiveness in the globalised economy, it is not at all clear that this should be equated with a fully deregulated, short-termist labour market. Many economic studies suggest that growth performance has been stronger in countries usually characterised as having a social, not a free, market. The very quick recovery of Germany from its recession shows that loose talk about the demise of the 'regulated' option is daft.
For these reasons, Dr Cable's implication that one can only have decent rights for workers after one has become a strong economy, and that the Social Chapter simply represents the stronger EU countries trying to force higher labour costs on the weaker, misses a large part of the argument. The Social Chapter is needed to create a fair society. It is also an important ingredient for creating a stronger British economy.
Yours sincerely,
DAN CORRY
Institute for Public
Policy Research
London, WC2
7 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments