Letter: Obliging the unemployed to train without obliging society to provide them with jobs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In his article 'Is workfare unfair?' (5 February), Andrew Marr suggests that unemployed people should be offered compulsory training rather than compulsory work. If only he would talk to unemployed people on the Employment Training programme about this, he would find out how mistaken this plea is. Even though ET is theoretically voluntary, many trainees tell of how they have had their 'arm twisted' by the Employment Service to go on it, and how they ended up wasting their own time, as well as sometimes ruining the training for people who really want to be there.
For many unemployed people, there is a world of difference between an obligation to train and an obligation to work. Society can not make anyone become a motivated trainee. Admittedly, people sometimes need to be persuaded to pursue their own self-development, but the worst possible way of achieving this is to tell them that whether or not they want training, they have got to endure it anyway.
Work is different. The overwhelming majority of unemployed people want work, and believe that people should work. They are generally relaxed about the idea of the long-term unemployed having a new obligation to work, so long as they have some real choice over the type of work that they do.
Either there should be an obligation for the long-term unemployed to work, in return for society having a new obligation to deliver that work, or there should not. To mix this up with an obligation to train, and limit this according to age, would be fundamentally mistaken.
Yours faithfully,
PETER ASHBY
Full Employment UK
London, N16
5 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments