LETTER: Oblections don't hold water
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GEOFFREY LEAN cites some potent evidence of poor decisions in the water supply industry ("The excuses run dry", 2 July). But, whatever the public's views on executives' pay or the adequacy of investment in the distribution network, one question has to be faced: in what other market does the customer expect, in return for a fixed annual charge, to receive any quantity desired of a commodity whose unit price is precisely zero?
Metering would save water, not only during summer droughts but also in the longer term, where users face the threat of steadily rising charges to meet the cost of increasing capacity to meet demands unrestricted by price. The objection that metering would "hurt the poor" scarcely holds water: the tariffs already available include both a fixed annual charge and a unit rate, and there would be no difficulty in including the entitlement to use a certain quantity at a zero price. That would meet basic needs for potable water and public health considerations. The losers from universal domestic metering would be those who use water extravagantly.
The reduction of leakage from the mains can but postpone the day when either metering is introduced (in line with unchallenged practice in almost every other country), or costly new works have to be undertaken. A good starting point would be for companies to restrict the use of hoses and sprinklers to those who had elected to pay by meter.
P G O'Neill
Cocking, West Sussex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments