Letter: Nuclear folly
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Central Electricity Generating Board estimated some 20 years ago that wave power could supply "the whole of Britain with electricity at the present rate of consumption". A more recent official evaluation for the European Union said that wave power could provide 85 per cent of the electricity needed by the member-countries.
We could be enjoying its benefits now if the last government had not abandoned it, in order to pursue Margaret Thatcher's ambition of building 10 pressurised water reactors in 10 years.
The research into wave power has been done. One neglected device, the invention of Sir Christopher Cockerell, is an articulated raft which was tested successfully in the Solent as long ago as 1978, with an energy minister on board. It could be mass-produced now, if the will exists.
DAVID ROSS
London SE5
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments