Letter: Now for the West Lothian Answers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In Andrew Marr's discussion of the devolution question (19 March), as in Robin Cook's recent remarks on the subject, the same automatic dismissal of the possibility of an English assembly appears. No counter-arguments are produced: Andrew Marr merely dubs it "Utopian".
I have an explanation for this absence of argument. To accept an English assembly would be for the first time to acknowledge the equality of Scotland, Wales, and England. It would be to throw off the last imperialist illusion.
I believe as a patriotic Englishman that an English assembly would be a revivifying proposal, which would have the same effect on Wales and Scotland without any danger of sliding into fascist nationalism, since a common valuing of the differences of each would emerge in this late historical admission of equality, this last surrender of old colonialism.
This both solves the West Lothian Question in the very best way and also gets rid of the British Empire at long last. It is that which is still a block to a true valuation and development of our English national culture. It would not break up the United Kingdom. On the contrary, the refusal to countenance equality is what would lead to its collapse.
Dr EDMOND WRIGHT
Cambridge
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments