Letter: Now for the West Lothian Answers

Simon Partridge
Friday 21 March 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Andrew Marr, for solid reasons, rules out the two most widely canvassed solutions to the West Lothian Question: decreasing the number of Scots MPs and a fully-fledged federal system for the UK. He pins his faith on a reformed electoral system which would reduce the differences between the historic nations of Britain.

This raises the question as to how much of the pressure for devolution for Scotland and Wales actually rises from feelings of suppressed national identity and how much is due to a reaction against the neo-liberal hegemony which has been imposed on the Union latterly from a political base heavily biased towards the Home Counties.

If a new, more widely based political consensus was established, whether by electoral reform or by a substantial Labour victory, we might predict that the present salience of the "national question" in British politics would be reduced. This might also open up the possibility of pursuing other options for devolution, such as returning power to cities and regions and revitalisation of local communities through urban neighbourhood and rural parish councils with real powers.

In a few years' time we may view the present high profile of national devolution and its infamous accompanying question as a passing phase - another unwelcome consequence of unbridled laissez-faire.

SIMON PARTRIDGE

London N2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in