Letter: Not horned but tusked
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In response to Andrew Graham-Dixon's article ('For sale, a piece of medieval magic', 7 June), I would like to dispel the myth furthered by the print of a narwhal showing the 'horn' emanating from the head above the animal's mouth. This was the normal way of fostering the concept of the unicorn of the sea, seen in an almost identical print by G. Kearsly, published in 1801, in which the term 'teeth' is clearly used, although two are considered rare.
The Latin name Monodon (monoceras) translates into single tooth, and correctly describes what is actually an elongated and articulating tooth extending generally from the lower left-hand side of the jaw, more normally referred to as a tusk.
For those of your readers fascinated by this little-known animal, there is a recently published book by F. Breummer devoted to the narwhal.
Yours sincerely,
KEN A. MANTEL
Narwhal Inuit Art Gallery
London, W4
11 June
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments