Letter: Not a hanging offence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IN AN otherwise welcome leading article on the Government's approach to racism ("Meaning well is not enough", 29 March), your unequivocal call for the sacking of the head of the Prison Service, Richard Tilt, seems, in my opinion, extreme and unjustified, a case perhaps of seeking to shoot the messenger.
For you, as others have, omit to mention that Mr Tilt was citing the evidence of scientific research which suggested "that people of Afro- Caribbean origin were more prone to suffer 'positional asphyxia' than white people due to a physiological difference". Indeed, such evidence, if substantiated, would be welcome in helping to end such tragic deaths in custody, not that a justifiable case can be made for such barbaric methods of restraint in any case.
There is no evidence to suggest that such comments stemmed from Mr Tilt's own beliefs or, more importantly, that they were born of any racial prejudice on his part, as you claim.
Admittedly, a man in a position of such prominence ought to have displayed a far greater degree of sensitivity, tact and good judgement in discussion of issues of such delicacy and importance; but surely his behaviour is not deserving of the penalty that you advocate?
Richard Bryant
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments