Letter: No UN backing for Clinton
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Both the Defence Secretary, Michael Portillo, and US government spokespeople have justified the American attack on Iraq with reference to UN Security Council Resolution 688, of 1991.
This resolution "condemns the repression of Iraqi civilian population ... including most recently in Kurdish- populated areas" and demands that Iraq "immediately end this repression". It goes on to empower the Secretary General to "use all the resources at his disposal, including those of the relevant UN agencies, to address urgently the critical needs of the refugees and displaced Iraqi population."
Nowhere does it provide for unilateral military action by any UN Security Council member to enforce this. President Clinton's decision to punish Saddam undermines the authority of the UN, whose own inspectors uncovering covert Iraqi military establishments are currently in Iraq.
Dr DAVID LOWRY
Stoneleigh, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments