Letter: No time for the basics in school
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.No time for the basics in school
Sir: David Blunkett ("Labour goes back to basics on teaching", 30 May) appears to be saying the right words at the moment. However, for too long primary education has suffered from well-meaning cries of back (I prefer forward) to basics and no changes in legislation to follow that up.
We still suffer from a National Curriculum - despite the Dearing review - that insists that we teach 10 subjects, albeit giving English, maths and science emphasis, and are inspected on that basis. I can imagine the outcry from Ofsted if a school said: "Sorry, we do not have time to teach music because we are concentrating on the basics." We need a dialogue between politicians, Ofsted, head teachers and teachers to balance what is important and what can be left to individual teachers. I suspect that there would be far more agreement than we think.
PETER BRINTON
Head Teacher,
Redruth, Cornwall
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments