Letter: No future for an EU a la carte

Mr E. Wistrich
Friday 29 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Andrew Marr's perceptive analysis of the internal Tory divisions about Britain's role in Europe ('The divided Tories: a split is plausible', 29 April) highlights a matter of momentous importance to the future of our country.

There is little doubt that most of our European Union partners want it to advance towards a genuine federation. A multi-speed Europe advancing to this common goal is already envisaged within the Maastricht Treaty's progress towards economic and monetary union. Such an option may well be extended to other areas as the EU is enlarged to include some of the East European applicants, who would need long transitional arrangements after entry to enable them to catch up economically with the rest.

A Europe of variable geometry in which individual countries could pick and choose the policies they wish to adopt on an a la carte basis will never be acceptable to our partners. So the choice for Britain will be either to stay in and accept the almost inevitable progress to a federation or plan for total withdrawal. Our best option then might be to join the European Economic Area just at the time when most of its present members, dissatisfied with their second-class status, wish to become full members of the EU.

Yours faithfully,

ERNEST WISTRICH

London, NW3

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in