Letter: No bar on bishops
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Sir: If the women priests legislation now before the General Synod will deny 'opponents any hope of advancement to the bench of bishops' (leading article, 13 July), it would indeed be sad. It does not. The facts are:
1. The legislation imposes no such bar, either expressly or by implication. On the contrary it contains a provision protecting bishops (and others) from any complaints under the sex discrimination laws in this field, a provision with no time limit.
2. A bishop elected after the enactment of the legislation would not be able to exclude its effect from his diocese; but he would be under no obligation himself to ordain or license a woman priest.
3. The issue has been before the Church of England for a decade. Despite well-publicised fears, this has not prevented the appointment of bishops opposed to the priestly ordination of women. I see no reason why this policy should be changed in any way by the passage of the legislation.
Yours faithfully,
DAVID McCLEAN
Chairman, House of Laity
General Synod of the
Church of England
Sheffield
14 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments