Letter: Nipper still lies in an unmarked grave
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The attempted exhumation of the remains of the dog immortalised by HMV took place in Kingston upon Thames and not St John's Wood ('Bitten by the Nipper bug'; Weekend, 7 August). As the then press officer to HMV, I initiated and organised this attempt after noticing an article by Enid Barraud (a great- niece of the artist Francis Barraud) in the then still published Children's Newspaper.
In her piece, Enid mentioned that Nipper had been buried by Mark Barraud, son of the artist's brother, under a mulberry tree in Kingston where he lived. With the hope of finding Nipper's remains and having them reinterred suitably at HMV in Hayes, I contacted Mark - then an active octogenarian - and after a short search he confidently located the tree in what was then a yard behind some offices. HMV gave carte blanche to proceed and an exhumation was arranged, under the supervision of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, to which the press were invited. The occasion was quite widely reported, although no dog's bones were found.
I'm still of the opinion that Nipper's remains are there, as Mark was lucidly confident of his facts and the volume of earth needed to be moved to raise the odds of discovery was
too great for the two days' digging we allowed.
Yours sincerely,
PETER WYMER
Richmond,
Surrey
9 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments